Warner Bros. Discovery and the BBC are facing criticism for their continued support of J. K. Rowling, following the author’s increasingly controversial stance on transgender issues. According to Deadline, the companies are accused of double standards regarding their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, especially after backing Rowling amidst her hardening rhetoric on trans rights.
Warner Bros. Discovery is collaborating with Rowling on the upcoming Harry Potter series for HBO’s Max streaming platform, while the BBC recently premiered Season 6 of Strike, based on Rowling’s novels under the pen name Robert Galbraith. The author serves as an executive producer on both projects.
Transgender community members, particularly those working in the media, have raised concerns over the companies’ decisions, noting that Rowling’s language on trans issues has shifted from measured disagreement to more inflammatory rhetoric over the past four years. These individuals argue that supporting Rowling contradicts the internal DEI policies of both organizations, particularly regarding the treatment of transgender employees.
In response, Warner Bros. Discovery has stated that Rowling has the “right to express her personal views,” while emphasizing that her involvement in the Harry Potter series will benefit the project. The BBC, meanwhile, declined to comment on Rowling’s views but reiterated its commitment to creating an inclusive workforce reflecting the diversity of the UK.
Critics argue that both companies’ actions undermine their public commitments to inclusivity. Bamby Salcedo, CEO of the TransLatin@ Coalition, expressed disappointment over the “confusion” caused by Warner Bros. Discovery’s progressive messaging for staff, contrasting with its support for Rowling. Similarly, Freddy McConnell, a transgender journalist, suggested that the BBC’s backing of Rowling could reinforce perceptions that the broadcaster is “institutionally transphobic.”
The debate has sparked further division within the industry, with some calling for a separation of art from politics, while others argue that supporting Rowling financially enables her views, which fund anti-trans causes. The controversy has raised important questions about the balance between artistic freedom and corporate responsibility in an increasingly polarized cultural landscape.
What do you think about all this? Let us know in the comments!